Difference between revisions of "Arguments Against the Belief in God"

From Smiting Shepherds
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
*[[Refutations_of_the_Arguments_for_the_Belief_in_God|The arguments for the belief in God are weak and unconvincing]], since they tend to rely on ambiguous terms, false premises, and/or [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies logical fallacies].
 
*[[Refutations_of_the_Arguments_for_the_Belief_in_God|The arguments for the belief in God are weak and unconvincing]], since they tend to rely on ambiguous terms, false premises, and/or [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies logical fallacies].
 
*God as an unnecessary hypothesis/Unfalsifiability/The God of the Gaps
 
*God as an unnecessary hypothesis/Unfalsifiability/The God of the Gaps
*[[There is no Afterlife|There is no afterlife.]] Specifically:
+
*[[There_is_no_Afterlife|There is no afterlife.]] Specifically:
**[[Heaven_Does Not_Exist|Heaven does not exist.]]
+
**[[Heaven_does_not_Exist|Heaven does not exist.]]
**[[Hell_Does Not_Exist|Hell does not exist.]]
+
**[[Hell_does_not_Exist|Hell does not exist.]]
 
*Atheism explains disbelief better than theism
 
*Atheism explains disbelief better than theism
 
*Lack of evidence for creationism and the theological need for a literal Genesis.
 
*Lack of evidence for creationism and the theological need for a literal Genesis.

Revision as of 21:46, 27 April 2017