Difference between revisions of "Arguments Against the Belief in God"

From Smiting Shepherds
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
*[[Refutations_of_the_Arguments_for_the_Belief_in_God|The arguments for the belief in God are weak and unconvincing]], since they tend to rely on ambiguous terms, false premises, and/or [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies logical fallacies].
 
*[[Refutations_of_the_Arguments_for_the_Belief_in_God|The arguments for the belief in God are weak and unconvincing]], since they tend to rely on ambiguous terms, false premises, and/or [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies logical fallacies].
 
*God as an unnecessary hypothesis/Unfalsifiability/The God of the Gaps.
 
*God as an unnecessary hypothesis/Unfalsifiability/The God of the Gaps.
*[[There_is_no_Afterlife|There is no afterlife]]  
+
*[[There_is_no_Afterlife|There is no afterlife]].
 
**...and more specifically, [[Hell_does_not_Exist|Hell does not exist]].
 
**...and more specifically, [[Hell_does_not_Exist|Hell does not exist]].
 
*Atheism explains disbelief better than theism.
 
*Atheism explains disbelief better than theism.

Revision as of 10:20, 8 May 2017