Difference between revisions of "Arguments Against the Belief in God"
From Smiting Shepherds
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*[[The_Religious_are_not_Moral_Exemplars|The religious ''are not'' moral exemplars]]. | *[[The_Religious_are_not_Moral_Exemplars|The religious ''are not'' moral exemplars]]. | ||
*Neglecting life and the world. | *Neglecting life and the world. | ||
| − | |||
*There are other ways to overcome the fear of death (sense of purpose). | *There are other ways to overcome the fear of death (sense of purpose). | ||
Revision as of 14:49, 17 June 2017
- The Problem of Evil.
- Omnipotence and Omniscience Arguments.
- The arguments for the belief in God are weak and unconvincing, since they tend to rely on ambiguous terms, false premises, and/or logical fallacies.
- God as an unnecessary hypothesis/Unfalsifiability/The God of the Gaps.
- There is no afterlife.
- ...and more specifically, Hell does not exist.
- The lack of evidence for creationism.
- "Cruel World" argument.
- The problems posed by religious pluralism.
- The religious are not moral exemplars.
- Neglecting life and the world.
- There are other ways to overcome the fear of death (sense of purpose).
