Difference between revisions of "Arguments Against the Belief in God"

From Smiting Shepherds
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
  
  
*The Problem of Evil
+
*[[The Problem of Evil]]
*Omnipotence and omniscience arguments
+
*[[Omnipotence and Omniscience Arguments]]
 
*[[Refutations_of_the_Arguments_for_the_Belief_in_God|The arguments for the belief in God]] are weak and unconvincing.
 
*[[Refutations_of_the_Arguments_for_the_Belief_in_God|The arguments for the belief in God]] are weak and unconvincing.
 
*God as an unnecessary hypothesis.
 
*God as an unnecessary hypothesis.

Revision as of 04:42, 21 April 2017


  • The Problem of Evil
  • Omnipotence and Omniscience Arguments
  • The arguments for the belief in God are weak and unconvincing.
  • God as an unnecessary hypothesis.
  • Atheism explains disbelief better than theism
  • Unfalsifiability
  • The God of the Gaps
  • Lack of evidence for creationism
  • Archeology and the Bible
  • Cruel world argument
  • Religious plurality (Aaron's Rod)
  • Religion does a poor job of teaching how to life a good life
  • Neglecting life and the world
  • Arguments against the existence of Heaven
  • Arguments against the existence of Hell
  • Maxwell’s Demon
  • There are other ways to overcome the fear of death (sense of purpose)