Difference between revisions of "Arguments Against the Belief in God"
From Smiting Shepherds
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*"Cruel World" argument. | *"Cruel World" argument. | ||
*The problems posed by [[Religious_Pluralism|religious pluralism]]. | *The problems posed by [[Religious_Pluralism|religious pluralism]]. | ||
| − | *[[ | + | *[[The_Clergy_are_not_Moral_Exemplars|The clergy ''are not'' moral exemplars]]. |
*Neglecting life and the world. | *Neglecting life and the world. | ||
*There are other ways to overcome the fear of death (sense of purpose). | *There are other ways to overcome the fear of death (sense of purpose). | ||
Revision as of 21:52, 31 July 2017
- The Problem of Evil.
- Omnipotence and Omniscience Arguments.
- The arguments for the belief in God are weak and unconvincing, since they tend to rely on ambiguous terms, false premises, and/or logical fallacies.
- God as an unnecessary hypothesis/Unfalsifiability/The God of the Gaps.
- There is no afterlife.
- ...and more specifically, Hell does not exist.
- The lack of evidence for creationism.
- "Cruel World" argument.
- The problems posed by religious pluralism.
- The clergy are not moral exemplars.
- Neglecting life and the world.
- There are other ways to overcome the fear of death (sense of purpose).
