Difference between revisions of "Pascal's Wager"

From Smiting Shepherds
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Pascal’s Wager''' uses game theory to show that you should believe in God, because it offers the best cost-to-benefit ratio. The argument is summarized in the table below:
+
[[File:Homer.png|center]]
  
{| class="wikitable"
+
'''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blaise_Pascal Pascal]’s Wager''' uses [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_theory game theory] to demonstrate that people should believe in God, because it offers the best [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost%E2%80%93benefit_analysiscost-to-benefit ratio]. The argument is summarized in the table below:
 +
 
 +
{| class="wikitable"  
 
! scope="col"|  
 
! scope="col"|  
 
! scope="col"| God Exists
 
! scope="col"| God Exists

Revision as of 22:51, 21 April 2017

Homer.png

Pascal’s Wager uses game theory to demonstrate that people should believe in God, because it offers the best ratio. The argument is summarized in the table below:

God Exists God Doesn’t Exist
You Believe Eternal heavenly bliss. You wasted all the time you spent worshiping.
You Disbelieve Eternal damnation. You saved all the time you would have spent worshiping.

However, there are three crippling problems with this argument:

  1. Pascal’s Wager was never intended to prove God’s existence. Pascal’s Wager is just an argument for going to church. Even then it never actually solves or answers anything -- it just changes the question from “why?” to “why not?”

    Admittedly, this is more of a problem with the popular use of the argument rather than the argument itself, but this needs to be addressed, as this occurs with great frequency.

  2. Argument from Inconsistent Revelations. Many of the world’s religions have independently developed their own version of Pascal’s Wager. By replacing the word “God” with “Ra,” “Odin,” or “Zeus,” then Pascal’s Wager becomes an equally valid argument for worship of any of those gods. However, Pascal’s Wager only holds true under the a priori assumption that you’ve selected the correct God. If you’re worshiping the “wrong” god, every week you’re just making the “real” god madder and madder. (If the Old Testament prophets really screwed up, and it turns out that Ba’al is the Lord, then even the saints are damned.)

    As such, Pascal’s Wager can be equally used to disprove the need for religion. If there is no God, or if he does not reward belief (e.g., dystheism) then religion is a huge waste of time and resources.

  3. Argument from Inauthentic Belief. If you believe only because of Pascal’s Wager, an all-knowing God will realize that you’re only paying him lip service, and just putting up a front to win a big payout later. Pascal’s Wager alone is not enough to “save” anyone, because it requires you to live a lie, and in turn, lie to God himself.