Difference between revisions of "Arguments Against the Belief in God"

From Smiting Shepherds
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with " The Problem of Evil Omnipotence and omniscience arguments God as an unnecessary hypothesis. Pascal’s wager revisited The arguments for God are weak. Atheism explains disbe...")
 
 
(41 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
[[File:Holmes.png|center]]
  
 +
Philosophers and have spent much time considering God’s existence. These difficult questions endure because Christian philosophers and theologians have never been able to answer them to anyone’s satisfaction -- especially their own.  This is intrinsically difficult, since many of these questions boil down to a call for evidence, whereas religious belief is built upon faith, which exists independently (and in spite) of evidence.
  
The Problem of Evil
+
'''Again, do not argue with the clergyman. Our strategy is not one of confrontation; but of malicious cooperation.''' Victory will be determined by the length and fruitlessness of your conversations. Arguing will reveal yourself as a troublemaker, and you will be denied any further opportunity to consume their time, ending your journey. Besides, you can’t directly deconvert a priest; they’re [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunk_cost pot-committed]. Deconversion and burnout are processes of erosion. However, discussing these issues in front of others can aid in their deconversion processes.
Omnipotence and omniscience arguments
+
 
God as an unnecessary hypothesis.
+
Synopses of the most common arguments against the belief in God are provided below. This is not an exhaustive list, but it should be more than sufficient; most seminarians are not required to study [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apologetics apologetics], and those who do often take a single 3-credit course. These challenging problems include:
Pascal’s wager revisited
+
 
The arguments for God are weak.
+
*[[The Problem of Evil]].
Atheism explains disbelief better than theism
+
*[[Omnipotence and Omniscience Arguments]].
Unfalsifiability
+
*[[Refutations_of_the_Arguments_for_the_Belief_in_God|The arguments for the belief in God are weak and unconvincing]], since they tend to rely on ambiguous terms, false premises, and/or [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies logical fallacies].
The God of the Gaps
+
*[[There_is_no_Afterlife|There is no afterlife]].
Lack of evidence for creationism
+
**...and more specifically, [[Hell_does_not_Exist|Hell does not exist]].
Archeology  and the Bible
+
*[[The_Bible_is_not_Credible|The Bible is not Credible]].
Cruel world argument
+
*[[Creationism is False|Creationism is False]].
Religious plurality (Aaron's Rod)
+
*The problems posed by [[Religious_Pluralism|religious pluralism]].
Religion does a poor job of teaching how to life a good life
+
*[[The_Clergy_are_not_Moral_Exemplars|The clergy ''are not'' moral exemplars]].
Neglecting life and the world
+
----
Arguments against the existence of Heaven
+
 
Arguments against the existence of Hell
+
{{Template:Navigation}}
Maxwell’s Demon
 
There are other ways to overcome the fear of death (sense of purpose)
 

Latest revision as of 05:05, 3 March 2019

Holmes.png

Philosophers and have spent much time considering God’s existence. These difficult questions endure because Christian philosophers and theologians have never been able to answer them to anyone’s satisfaction -- especially their own. This is intrinsically difficult, since many of these questions boil down to a call for evidence, whereas religious belief is built upon faith, which exists independently (and in spite) of evidence.

Again, do not argue with the clergyman. Our strategy is not one of confrontation; but of malicious cooperation. Victory will be determined by the length and fruitlessness of your conversations. Arguing will reveal yourself as a troublemaker, and you will be denied any further opportunity to consume their time, ending your journey. Besides, you can’t directly deconvert a priest; they’re pot-committed. Deconversion and burnout are processes of erosion. However, discussing these issues in front of others can aid in their deconversion processes.

Synopses of the most common arguments against the belief in God are provided below. This is not an exhaustive list, but it should be more than sufficient; most seminarians are not required to study apologetics, and those who do often take a single 3-credit course. These challenging problems include: