Difference between revisions of "Arguments Against the Belief in God"

From Smiting Shepherds
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
*[[The Problem of Evil]]
 
*[[The Problem of Evil]]
 
*[[Omnipotence and Omniscience Arguments]]
 
*[[Omnipotence and Omniscience Arguments]]
*[[Refutations_of_the_Arguments_for_the_Belief_in_God|The arguments for the belief in God are weak and unconvincing]], since they tend to rely on ambiguous terms, false premises, or [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies logical fallacies].
+
*[[Refutations_of_the_Arguments_for_the_Belief_in_God|The arguments for the belief in God are weak and unconvincing]], since they tend to rely on ambiguous terms, false premises, and/or [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies logical fallacies].
 
*God as an unnecessary hypothesis/Unfalsifiability/The God of the Gaps
 
*God as an unnecessary hypothesis/Unfalsifiability/The God of the Gaps
 
*Atheism explains disbelief better than theism
 
*Atheism explains disbelief better than theism

Revision as of 02:12, 25 April 2017