Difference between revisions of "Arguments Against the Belief in God"
From Smiting Shepherds
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*[[Omnipotence and Omniscience Arguments]]. | *[[Omnipotence and Omniscience Arguments]]. | ||
*[[Refutations_of_the_Arguments_for_the_Belief_in_God|The arguments for the belief in God are weak and unconvincing]], since they tend to rely on ambiguous terms, false premises, and/or [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies logical fallacies]. | *[[Refutations_of_the_Arguments_for_the_Belief_in_God|The arguments for the belief in God are weak and unconvincing]], since they tend to rely on ambiguous terms, false premises, and/or [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies logical fallacies]. | ||
− | *God | + | *God is an unnecessary hypothesis; a "God of the Gaps". |
*[[There_is_no_Afterlife|There is no afterlife]]. | *[[There_is_no_Afterlife|There is no afterlife]]. | ||
**...and more specifically, [[Hell_does_not_Exist|Hell does not exist]]. | **...and more specifically, [[Hell_does_not_Exist|Hell does not exist]]. |
Revision as of 10:57, 16 August 2017
- The Problem of Evil.
- Omnipotence and Omniscience Arguments.
- The arguments for the belief in God are weak and unconvincing, since they tend to rely on ambiguous terms, false premises, and/or logical fallacies.
- God is an unnecessary hypothesis; a "God of the Gaps".
- There is no afterlife.
- ...and more specifically, Hell does not exist.
- Creationism is False.
- The problems posed by religious pluralism.
- The clergy are not moral exemplars.