Difference between revisions of "Refutations of the Arguments for the Belief in God"
From Smiting Shepherds
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
2. Religion is useful. | 2. Religion is useful. | ||
3. Atheism is morally and socially corrosive. | 3. Atheism is morally and socially corrosive. | ||
+ | ---- | ||
{{Template:Navigation}} | {{Template:Navigation}} |
Revision as of 03:22, 20 April 2017
- First Mover (Kalām) Argument
- Arguments from Design
- Pascal’s Wager
- The Ontological Argument
- Argument from Common consent (e.g., the bandwagon; argumentum ad populum)
- The existence of souls and the “spark of life”
- Argument from the idea of God
- Argument from contingency
- Argument from miracles
- Argument from time
- Argument from religious experiences
- Argument from desire
- Existence of Moral law
- Authority of the conscience
- Existence of saints (Galilleo & Bruno? Are martyrs suicides?)
- Argument from beauty
- Argument from the meaning of life.
- Argument from love.
There are only 3 arguments used against critiques of religion: [Manual for creating atheists]
1. Religion is true.
2. Religion is useful.
3. Atheism is morally and socially corrosive.