Difference between revisions of "Arguments Against the Belief in God"
From Smiting Shepherds
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*The problems posed by [[Religious_Pluralism|religious pluralism]]. | *The problems posed by [[Religious_Pluralism|religious pluralism]]. | ||
*[[The_Clergy_are_not_Moral_Exemplars|The clergy ''are not'' moral exemplars]]. | *[[The_Clergy_are_not_Moral_Exemplars|The clergy ''are not'' moral exemplars]]. | ||
− | |||
---- | ---- | ||
{{Template:Navigation}} | {{Template:Navigation}} |
Revision as of 11:07, 4 August 2017
- The Problem of Evil.
- Omnipotence and Omniscience Arguments.
- The arguments for the belief in God are weak and unconvincing, since they tend to rely on ambiguous terms, false premises, and/or logical fallacies.
- God as an unnecessary hypothesis/Unfalsifiability/The God of the Gaps.
- There is no afterlife.
- ...and more specifically, Hell does not exist.
- The lack of evidence for creationism.
- "Cruel World" argument.
- The problems posed by religious pluralism.
- The clergy are not moral exemplars.